SPL Etiquette – Do’s and Don’ts for SPL-work-group wiki
The purpose of the SPL-work-group wiki is to establish a forum for members of industry, government, academia, and software vendors to learn about the SPL standard and keep up-to-date with meetings/discussions and emerging changes to the standard.
Wiki Roles:
Guest/Visitor:
Privileges: read-only access (no write or edit), may view all pages
Anyone can access the SPL-work-group wiki
Anyone can join the wiki as a member to contribute comments/recommendations in a discussion page
Member/Editor:
Privileges: Guest privileges plus create new page, write/edit content
Limited to the SPL-work-group wiki team, a group of volunteers from the HL7 SPL Working Group
Responsible for addressing and reviewing questions posted on the discussion pages
Organizer/Administrator:
Privileges:Member/Editor privileges, plus creation of other organizers for the space
Can remove, rework or reformat content
The HL7 SPL Working Group includes members from industry, academia, government, consultants, and vendors. The following policies and guidelines apply to this wiki to ensure that the information posted is reliable and useful. The source of these policies and guidelines are based on the principles from Wikipedia: Policies and guidelines. 1.SPL-work-group wiki IS: a.A collection of true and useful information on the topic of Structured Product Labeling (SPL). b.A community-built resource to facilitate the sharing of information related to SPL 2.SPL-work-group wiki is NOT: a.A forum for publishing personal opinions or speculation about SPL b.A forum for advertising or promoting of any software, technology, or vendor for SPL 3.Verifiability:Information on the SPL-work-group wiki should be verifiable. Whenever possible, include links or references to where the information can be verified.Readers should be able to check that material added to the wiki has already been obtained from a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed.Obtain permission from content owners when posting previously-unpublished content from a third party. 4.Reliable Source: Reliable sources should be fact-checked for accuracy and are necessary both to substantiate material within articles and to give credit to authors and publishers in order to avoid plagiarism and copyright violations. Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article. Examples of reliable sources would be information posted on websites from: government, standards organizations and academic universities; peer-reviewed journals; textbooks; industry magazines; books published by respected publishing houses or trade organizations; and mainstream newspapers. Materials produced and reviewed by members of the Health Level 7 SPL Working Group Leadership Team. Self-published materials (i.e., presentations, whitepapers, etc) reviewed by the HL7 SPL Leadership Team. 5.Not a Blog: SPL-work-group wiki does not publish individual arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position. 6. Neutral Point of View:The SPL-work-group wiki should represent all views; therefore, all wiki content must be written from a neutral point of view, without bias. Because the SPL-work-group wiki is a community-built, informational resource with the potential to have an international exposure, we cannot expect collaborators to agree in all cases. All contributors shouldmake an effort to present these conflicting views fairly, without advocating any one of them. 7.Assume good faith and be civil: The contributors of this wiki are trying to help the project, not hurt it.Content provided should be written in a manner that is professional and consistent with the purpose of the HL7 SPL Working Group. When there is a disagreement on the content posted to the wiki, comments should be written in a respectful and professional tone that will not offend or disparage others (See Policy Enforcement on how to submit comments to the wiki). Policy enforcement All users of the SPL-work-group wiki have the right and should help with enforcing our policies. The SPL-work-group wiki is collective work created by many volunteers. We should not accept that others use the SPL-work-group wiki for purposes like advertising, personal promotion, etc. When you make significant changes or delete someone else’s content, please also write a short comment about it in the "Summary" field of the edit page of the article. If your corrections are not accepted by the original author then see the section below on conflict resolution. Anyone who sees content which is not following our policies should contact the HL7 SPL Chair (email: Theresa.M.Brunone@gsk.com). Conflict resolution When content on the wiki is challenged or questioned, editors/contributors should first try to resolve the conflict by understanding the nature of the conflict (reason/rationale for the dispute) and work to resolve with the challenging party. However, if you are unable to reach consensus, contributors should involve other SPL Team members, including SPL Leadership Team members, senior contributors, and administrators to reach consensus.
SPL Etiquette – Do’s and Don’ts for SPL-work-group wiki
The purpose of the SPL-work-group wiki is to establish a forum for members of industry, government, academia, and software vendors to learn about the SPL standard and keep up-to-date with meetings/discussions and emerging changes to the standard.
Wiki Roles:
The HL7 SPL Working Group includes members from industry, academia, government, consultants, and vendors. The following policies and guidelines apply to this wiki to ensure that the information posted is reliable and useful. The source of these policies and guidelines are based on the principles from Wikipedia: Policies and guidelines.
1. SPL-work-group wiki IS:
a. A collection of true and useful information on the topic of Structured Product Labeling (SPL).
b. A community-built resource to facilitate the sharing of information related to SPL
2. SPL-work-group wiki is NOT:
a. A forum for publishing personal opinions or speculation about SPL
b. A forum for advertising or promoting of any software, technology, or vendor for SPL
3. Verifiability: Information on the SPL-work-group wiki should be verifiable. Whenever possible, include links or references to where the information can be verified. Readers should be able to check that material added to the wiki has already been obtained from a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed. Obtain permission from content owners when posting previously-unpublished content from a third party.
4. Reliable Source: Reliable sources should be fact-checked for accuracy and are necessary both to substantiate material within articles and to give credit to authors and publishers in order to avoid plagiarism and copyright violations. Sources should directly support the information as it is presented in an article.
Examples of reliable sources would be information posted on websites from: government, standards organizations and academic universities; peer-reviewed journals; textbooks; industry magazines; books published by respected publishing houses or trade organizations; and mainstream newspapers. Materials produced and reviewed by members of the Health Level 7 SPL Working Group Leadership Team.
Self-published materials (i.e., presentations, whitepapers, etc) reviewed by the HL7 SPL Leadership Team.
5. Not a Blog: SPL-work-group wiki does not publish individual arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position.
6.
Neutral Point of View: The SPL-work-group wiki should represent all views; therefore, all wiki content must be written from a neutral point of view, without bias.
Because the SPL-work-group wiki is a community-built, informational resource with the potential to have an international exposure, we cannot expect collaborators to agree in all cases. All contributors should make an effort to present these conflicting views fairly, without advocating any one of them.
7. Assume good faith and be civil: The contributors of this wiki are trying to help the project, not hurt it. Content provided should be written in a manner that is professional and consistent with the purpose of the HL7 SPL Working Group. When there is a disagreement on the content posted to the wiki, comments should be written in a respectful and professional tone that will not offend or disparage others (See Policy Enforcement on how to submit comments to the wiki).
Policy enforcement
All users of the SPL-work-group wiki have the right and should help with enforcing our policies. The SPL-work-group wiki is collective work created by many volunteers. We should not accept that others use the SPL-work-group wiki for purposes like advertising, personal promotion, etc. When you make significant changes or delete someone else’s content, please also write a short comment about it in the "Summary" field of the edit page of the article. If your corrections are not accepted by the original author then see the section below on conflict resolution. Anyone who sees content which is not following our policies should contact the HL7 SPL Chair (email: Theresa.M.Brunone@gsk.com).
Conflict resolution
When content on the wiki is challenged or questioned, editors/contributors should first try to resolve the conflict by understanding the nature of the conflict (reason/rationale for the dispute) and work to resolve with the challenging party. However, if you are unable to reach consensus, contributors should involve other SPL Team members, including SPL Leadership Team members, senior contributors, and administrators to reach consensus.